3.“程序的法治化，首先应当是侦查权力的法治化。”这是孙长永博士在与笔者的通信中表达的一个观点，也是他在其著作《侦查程序与人权》（中国方正出版社，2000年版）的基本精神。在研究诱惑侦查问题的过程中，与孙先生的交流给予了我很多启发，在此谨表谢忱。
【参考文献】[1] Daniel Potenberg , The Police Detection Practice of Encouragement ,49 Va.L.Rev.1963,p.871.
[2] Sorrells v. U.S., 287 U.S.435, 53 S. Ct. 210, 77L. ED. 413(1932),See Jerold H. Israel and Wayne.R.Lafave , Criminal Procedure, West Group 1993,5th ed,p.174.
[3]Grisword V. State of Conn. ,381 U.S. 479,85 S. Ct. 1678,14 L.ED.2d 510 (1965),175.
[4] Sorrells v. U.S., Id.
[5]Kamisar, Lafave and Israel, Modern Criminal Procedure, 7th ed, 1990 By West Publishing Co.p.387.
[6] Sherman v. U.S.,356 U.S.369,78 S.Ct. 819, 2 L. Ed. 2d 848(1958).
[7] Seidman ,The Supreme Court, Entrapment , and Our Criminal Justice Dilemma,1981 Sup.Ct.Rev.,p.118.
[8] Park, The Entrapment Controversy,60 Minn.L.Rev.1976,p.270.
[9] Brian Thomas Feeny, The Court Refines Entrapment Law in Jacobson v. United States, 42 Cath. U.L. Rev.1993. p.1027, and See Supra, Gregg, at 181,182.
[10] People v. Barraza, 591 P.2d 947 (Cal.1979).
[11] DeFeo, Entrapment as a Defense to Criminal Responsibility, 1 U.S.F.L. Rev.1967,p.243, 275-276.
[12] Kamisar, Lafave and Israel, Basic Criminal Procedure-Cases, Comments and Questions, 7th ed, West Publishing Co.1990,p.395-396.
[13] Whelan, Lead Us Not Into (Unwarranted) Temptation: A Proposal to Replace the Entrapment Defense With a Reasonable Suspicion Requirement, 133 U.Pa.L.Rev.1985,p.1193,1199-1200.
[14] U.S.v. Russell, 411 U.S.432,93 S.Ct.1637,36L.ED.2d 366(1973).
[15] Kamisar, Lafave and Israel, Modern Criminal Procedure, 7th ed, 1990 By West Publishing Co.,p.388.
[16] U.S. v. Twigg, 588 F.2d 373 (3d Cir.1978).
[17] Abramson & Lindeman, Entrapment and Due Process in the Federal Courts, 8Am .J. Crim. Law 1980, p.139, 180-182.
[18] [英]丹宁：法律的正当程序[M]．中译本，北京：法律出版社1999，109。

第 [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] 页 共[7]页