|
KAN.STAT.ANN.?82a-701(a)(1989). Id.
前引书,第20页。
前引书,第99页。
F.H.LawsonandB.Rudden,《财产法》,施天涛、梅慎实、孔祥俊译,中国大百科全书出版社1998年版,第20页。
2 Kinney, Irrigation and Water Rights? 1787(2ded.1912).
BverfGE,58,300(338f.), 转引自李建良:《论环境保护与人权保障之关系》,《东吴法律学报》2000年第2期。
参见上引,李建良文。
常云昆:《黄河断流与黄河水权制度研究》,中国社会科学出版社2001年版,第78页。
前引,林柏璋书。
DavidH.Getches,WaterLawinaNutshell,77(2d.1990).
萧正洪:《环境与技术变迁》,中国社会科学出版社1998年版,转引自前引,常云昆书,第60页。
前引书,第32页。
前引,裴丽萍文。
Krista Koehl, Partial For feiture of Water Rights: Oregon Compromises Traditional Principles to Achieve Flexibility, 28 Envtl. L.1140-41(1998).
1 Wells A. Hutchins, Water Rights Laws in the Ninetine Western States. 440(1971).
Charles F. Wilk inson, Crossing the Next Meridian :Land, Water, and the Future of the West, 234 (1992).
StevenJ. Shupe, Waterin Western Water Law: A Blue print for Change ,61Or. L. Rev.483, 488(1982).
National Water Comm’n, A Summary –Digest of State Water Laws 5(Richard L. Dewsnup&Dallin W.Jenseneds.,1973).
Janet C. Neuman, Beneficial Use, Waste, and Forfeiture: The In efficient Search for Efficiency in Western Water Use, 28 Envtl. L.920(1998).
David H.Getches, Water Law in a Nut shell 76 (2ded. 1990).
前引,裴丽萍文。
Krista Koehl, Partial For feiture of Water Rights: Oregon Compromises Traditional Principles to Achieve Flexibility, 28Envtl. L.1140-41(1998).
David H. Getches, Water Law in a Nut shell 74, 78 (2ded. 1990).
National Water Commn, A Summary- Digest of State Water Laws 5 (RichardL. Dewsnup & Dallin W.Jenseneds.,1973).
Abbott v. Department of Ecology (Inre Matter of Deadman Creek Drainage Bash), 103 Wash. 2d at 686,687-88, 694P. 2d at 1071,1072).
前引书,第32页。
Janet C. Neuman & Keith Hirokama, How Good Is an Old Water Rights? The Application of Statutory Forf eiture Provision to Pre-Code Water Rights, University of Denver Water Law Review. (Fall2000).
前引,金泽良雄文。
前引书,第112页。
|
