法搜网--中国法律信息搜索网
股东代表诉讼中公司的地位和作用(上)——以美国特别诉讼委员会制度为中心

  Henn&Alexander,Laws of Corporation(3rd ed.)1983,p.367;Aronson v.Lewis,473A.2d 813(Del.Supr.1984).  
  See,Block&Prussin,“ermination of Derivative Suits Against Directors on Business Judgment Grounds:From Zapata to Aronson,”9 Bus.Law,1984,pp.1507-1510.  
  Henn&Alexander,supra note,p.1974;Auerbach v.Bennett,47N.Y.2d 619,429N.Y.S.2d 920,393N.E.2d 994(N.Y.1979);Zapata Corp.v.Maldonado,430 A.2d 779(Del.1981).  
  Murdock,“Corporate Governance:the Role of Special Litigation Committee,”68 Wash.L.Rew,1993,p.88.  
  对于委员会成员的任职资格,《示范事业公司法》使用了“独立(independent)”一词,其理由是“独立”一词本身包含了与相关交易不存在必然的利害关系(See,The Committee on Corporate Laws,“Changes in the Model Business Corporation Act:Amendments Pertaining to Derivative Proceedings,”45 Bus.Law,1990,p.1248)。  
  ALI,Principles of Corporate Governance:Analysis and Recommendation,§7.09.  
  See,Dent,“The Power of Directors to Terminate Shareholder Litigation:The Death of Derivative Suits,”75 Nw.U.L.Rev.,1980,p.109.  
  See,Veasey,“Seeking a Safe Harbor from Judicial Scrutiny of Directors Business Decisions:An Analytical Framework for Litigation Strategy and Counseling Directors,”37 Bus.Law,1982,p.1260.  
  Murdock,supra note,p.104.  
  Note,Special Litigation Committees and the Business Judgment Rule:Zapata and Joy,14 Conn.L.Rev.,1981,p.208.  
  Murdock,supra note,p.104.  
  Brown,“Shareholder Derivative Litigation and the Litigation Committee,”43 U.Pitt.L.Rev.,1982,p.647.  


第 [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] 页 共[10]页
上面法规内容为部分内容,如果要查看全文请点击此处:查看全文
【发表评论】 【互动社区】
 
相关文章